Harraz reported in 2016 that the theory and practice of leaching are well-developed because for many years leaching has been used to separate metals from their ores and to extract sugar from sugar beets. Environmental engineers have become concerned with leaching more recently because of the multitude of dumps and landfills that contain hazardous and toxic wastes. Sometimes the natural breakdown of a toxic chemical results in another chemical that is even more toxic. Rain that passes through these materials enters ground water, lakes, streams, wells, ponds, and the like.
The author concluded that:
In the most cases solution mining has a very high economic efficiency because:
 The investment costs are low. (We don‘t need a mine).
 The drilling of the bore holes are running costs.
 The demand of manpower is low.
 Solution mining can also used by difficult hydrogeological conditions.
 The first step of the potash mill (hot leaching) is in the underground. There are no costs for this equipment.
 Residue and high concentrated brine stays in the cavern, therefore there environmental burdens are low.
ï± If the geological and technical conditions are very difficult, the solution mining is not usable.