Resource thumbnail

French tycoon Dominique Louis is doubling down (meaning investing heavily) on atomic power (using word "atomic" for negative, subtle impact), betting (what else in investing?) that global warming will foster a nuclear renaissance. Three months ago, his nuclear engineering group Assystem SA sold 61 percent of its automotive and aircraft business for 400 million euros ($472 million). Louis used the proceeds to buy back some of the company’s shares AND acquire 5 percent of French nuclear reactor maker Areva NP for 125 million euros.

While France is cutting its nuclear dependence (in response to the pressure for Liberals supporting windmills and solar energy), the Assystem chairman and chief executive officer believes (concluded?) that atomic energy will be back in vogue as the cost of climate change mounts. Louis expects Electricite de France SA to build 20 to 30 new reactors to partially replace its aging fleet as intermittent supply and local opposition to wind farms limits renewable capacity. “My bet is that we’re going to start having climate accidents, and that public opinion will turn around very quickly,” Louis, who controls 61 percent of Assystem, said in an Nov. 29 interview at his Paris office. “Nuclear, alongside renewable energies, is the best way to replace coal.” (Sounds like a rational view).

Doubts about the future of nuclear power in France have proliferated in recent years (What? but only because of cheap gas and coal). The state was forced to bail out Areva’s near-bankrupt parent company after delays and cost overruns at a nuclear plant it’s building in Finland, and as demand slumped following the 2011 Fukushima catastrophe in Japan....(but after realizing that "a nuclear meltdown" can be managed properly without the loss of even one life in Japan, such was not a "catastrophe" but is intending to confuse the damage and deaths caused by the tsunamis.) Fukushima was the result of a tsunami that flooded backup generators rather than a technical fault with the Japanese reactors, according to Louis (which is a true statement), an engineer by training. Those once-in-a-lifetime accidents may be a price worth paying to avoid sea levels rising by 1 or 2 meters, he said. “We may need to accept another Fukushima in the next 50 or 100 years,” the CEO said (now that we know that we can handle damage to such plants without the loss of lives, and that we can design plants to withstand earthquakes and tsunamis.

The government has a stated goal of reducing atomic power to 50 percent of France’s electricity output by as early as 2030 from 72 percent last year.....(which allows plenty of time to correct the course when the windmills and solar farm reveal their inherent inability to provide electricity at reasonable rates to support a reliable power grid).

While more stringent safety requirements following Fukushima are pushing up costs (but not by any significant amounts), Bloomberg New Energy Finance predicted in June that atomic energy will still rank third for investment behind wind and solar power by 2040. Half of the $1.4 trillion of nuclear investments will go to China, with the rest spread across Europe, India, the Middle East and Africa.

With the Chinese partly focused on their home market, there will be opportunities elsewhere, the 66-year-old Assystem CEO said. India will probably buy French reactors, alongside Russian plants, as it develops a nuclear industry, Louis said. Assytem is also working with Russia’s Rosatom Corp. on projects in Finland and Turkey, he said. While a nuclear renaissance in Europe may take 10 or 15 years, Areva and Assystem will benefit in the meantime from maintenance and upgrading at EDF’s nuclear facilities, Louis said.(We'll see how working with the Russians turns out ....Louis best watch his backdoors).

 

Visit This Resource »

Resource Portal for I2M Clients, Associates, and Geoscientists
Managed & Built by I2M Consulting, LLC | © 2010-

I2M Corporation logo