Derek Ezovski blogs that he works with lenders and borrowers nationwide and historically, environmental due diligence consisted of Phase I ESAs for most transactions/loans and Transaction Screen Assessments (TSAs) for lower risk transactions/loans. However, over the past 10 or so years, for many reasons including new SBA guidance documents, higher levels of risk tolerance and the development of new lower level environmental screening tools (Records Search with Risk Assessment, Desktop Reviews, ORMS EnviroFlash reports), he has seen more variations of environmental due diligence being used. Because of this, he has also seen the use of the TSA decreasing dramatically. In addition, the TSA provides no protections from CERCLA liability like that of a property ASTM/AAI Phase I does.
In his opinion, the main reason for this is cost. The SBA has pretty much removed the TSA from its due diligence options (with the exception of car washes without fueling operations). Unfortunately, he often sees TSAs being used to save money for SBA deals but if anything is found to be an issue, it automatically has to go to a Phase I before anything else is done. This costs money and often more importantly, time is lost for a transaction.
The issue is not that it is usually not being used to add more detail to a screening product but rather to remove fees from a more robust Phase I.
Resource Portal for I2M Clients, Associates, and Geoscientists
Managed & Built by I2M Consulting, LLC | © 2010-
Managed & Built by I2M Consulting, LLC | © 2010-