Ted Jones opines that the Export-Import Bank enables U.S. nuclear suppliers to reduce Russian energy dominance. Notably, Jack Spencer of the Heritage Foundation acknowledges the challenges posed by Russian competition in global nuclear energy markets. He accepts that U.S. nuclear exporters are contending with aggressive Russian expansion and that favorable financing terms is one of the Russian key competitive advantages. And he acknowledges that the Russian expansion into in nuclear energy power plant construction increases the over reliance of U.S. partners on Russian energy, implicating broader U.S. national security interests.
As an alternative response to the Russian nuclear energy export strategy, Jack suggests streamlining U.S. export regulations for U.S. nuclear cooperation partners. Modernizing U.S. nuclear export controls is a necessary but insufficient step toward a level playing field with Russian and other foreign nuclear energy suppliers. Crucially, it would do nothing to address the competitive imbalance in financing, which is often the decisive factor in nuclear energy tenders. In short, if the Ex-Im Bank goes away, the U.S. nuclear energy industry will lose a critical tool for competing against Russian nuclear energy supply. Export control reform is not a substitute.
Resource Portal for I2M Clients, Associates, and Geoscientists
Managed & Built by I2M Consulting, LLC | © 2010-
Managed & Built by I2M Consulting, LLC | © 2010-